Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 18:05:20 07/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2004 at 19:17:22, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On July 06, 2004 at 18:51:03, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On July 06, 2004 at 18:46:10, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:43:21, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:36:43, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:15:53, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 18:06:06, Amir Ban wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 17:41:05, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Amir, congratulations for the nice game! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I have not seen any info about the hardware beeing used by Junior at the current >>>>>>>>WCCC. Please tell it to the observers! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>With best regards, >>>>>>>>Dieter >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It's an HP Proliant server. This is all HP is allowing me to say :( >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Amir >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>And this is allowed in accordance with the ICGA rules?? - Mhhhh. Strange. >>>>> >>>>>Why not? Since there is no limit on hardware someone could show up with the >>>>>worlds fastest computer and it makes no difference. I would be interested in >>>>>the NPS Junior is hitting. While analyzing the game Diep-Junior I saw Junior 8 >>>>>hit over 1.6M nps on my XP2400. Bob says he is hitting 8M minimum! >>>>>Jim >>>> >>>> >>>>So it would be possible that I am connected with the strongest computer in >>>>Japan, the second strongest was just bought by the university of >>>>BadenWürtemberg, and my fictive Rorybest is completely ok within the rules??? >>>>Fine! Thanks. >>> >>>If you can write a chess program to take advantage of it's speed I would surely >>>love to see it play chess. >> >>Ok, thanks, although I don't know exactly what this means or what it takes, at >>least I can understand that there is no automatical stronger output. Anyway it'a >>also a gambler motif I can see here. It's the typical trick we can expect, when >>Amir begins to play out his different personality joker in the last rounds - >>then you can no longer "prepare" or hope that your counter-tuning has success. >>Ok, all from a lay's heart. :) > > >So? More power to Amir. >Dan H. Agree 100%. If you put in the 6 months + required to create a good parallel search, you deserve the extra ply or two you get from a quad. anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.