Author: Albert Silver
Date: 16:20:57 07/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2004 at 14:28:31, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>On July 07, 2004 at 13:34:11, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On July 07, 2004 at 13:19:33, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>>
>>>On July 07, 2004 at 12:09:14, Albert Silver wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 07, 2004 at 11:30:24, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>It has been a surprise to analyze Junior-Diep game, specially when you have read
>>>>>here so many posts by Diepeveen talking of the huge knowledge capabilities of
>>>>>his program. Looking at the position before white rook taking "a" pawn it is not
>>>>>neccesary to be more than 2000 elo player to see the threats lurking in the
>>>>>position, the great activity, open or scarcely hidden, of black pieces, all of
>>>>>them aiming at the white king or near it.
>>>>>Oh well, said Diep, but a pawn is a pawn....
>>>>>If there is a program that can talk of knowledge is or has been Junior. At least
>>>>>he really knows to attack.
>>>>>Anyway, I got fun. As a lover of dedicated units, I chose to take Diep endeavour
>>>>>in this game as a kind of homage to those old machines.
>>>>>Very poignant indeed.
>>>>>fernando
>>>>
>>>>You've heard of those nonsense posts on "what if a program like Junior were to
>>>>run on the Deep Blue hardware?". Well, this is a similar experiment with the
>>>>Chess Challenger software running on hardware that is thousands if not millions
>>>>of times faster.
>>>>
>>>>A lot of people don't realize the meaning of the DIEP acronym, mistakenly
>>>>thinking it has something to do with the author's name: Diminished Intellect
>>>>Experimental Program.
>>>>
>>>> Albert
>>>
>>>
>>>A lot of people don't realize about the meaning of your name:
>>>A = Antagonist
>>>l = loser
>>>b = brat
>>>e = emaciated
>>>r = ragged
>>>t = trivial
>>>
>>>S = sordid
>>>i = incompetent
>>>l = lyer
>>>v = vermin
>>>e = envious
>>>r = ragged
>>>
>>>Only just a thought......
>>
>>Fair enough. My only thought upon reading this, other than raised eyebrows was:
>>lunatic.
>>
>
>Well, there are several possibilities.... one....you insult the work of
>somebody, dont expect to receive polite words.... two, you remark the game of
>any engine in one game. It is Ok.
>
>However, the compulsive obssesion of some people to insult and then become a
>victim is not acceptable. You write in rude terms, then I also know how to write
>in those terms.
>
>It depends how you act. I am really fed up how people insult and insult and
>then, they become the victims of the kitchen.
>
>Please, talking about selenites, you got the first prize...
You are already on my list of lunatics. Now you are on my filter list. Peace.
Oh, and watch that blood pressure.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.