Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 21:27:03 12/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 1998 at 16:13:09, Jim Paul wrote: >This is related to my previous CM6000 posting. >What would most people regard as the typical rating improvement in blitz >compared to standard time controls for most PC chess programs these days? > >I know it heavily depends on whether the program is mainly a "heavy calculator" >or a "knowledge based" program, ie. I'd expect Rebel and Hiarcs to exhibit less >of a blitz rating increase (if any) compared to their standard 40/2 ratings (on >SSDF or Selective Search rating lists) for example. Whereas Fritz and probably >CM6000 would have higher ratings at blitz. > >I'd expect CM6000 to play about 100 ELO points higher at blitz than it's SSDF >rating (when it gets one anyway !!). That would make it around 2550 at blitz ?! > >Any ideas / suggestions ? > >Jim CM6000 is a better standard player and it plays at the top with 1hr+ per side it has no ssdf rating look at some games in the recent posts against Junior5
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.