Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 16:33:01 12/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 1998 at 11:03:25, blass uri wrote: > >On December 24, 1998 at 16:13:09, Jim Paul wrote: > >>This is related to my previous CM6000 posting. >>What would most people regard as the typical rating improvement in blitz >>compared to standard time controls for most PC chess programs these days? >> >>I know it heavily depends on whether the program is mainly a "heavy calculator" >>or a "knowledge based" program > > >No, It is not truth >Hiarcs7 is a "knowledge based" program and it is good at tactics and did very >good results in blitz games > >, ie. I'd expect Rebel and Hiarcs to exhibit less >>of a blitz rating increase (if any) compared to their standard 40/2 ratings (on >>SSDF or Selective Search rating lists) for example. Whereas Fritz and probably >>CM6000 would have higher ratings at blitz. > >CM6000 is not very strong at blitz and is better at longer time control. >> >>I'd expect CM6000 to play about 100 ELO points higher at blitz than it's SSDF >>rating (when it gets one anyway !!). That would make it around 2550 at blitz ?! > >In other words you say that you expect chessmaster6000 to have 2450 at long time >control. > >I expect chessmaster to have better results( more than 2550 ssdf rating with a >chance to be number 1 in the ssdf list) > >Uri The best programs can easily compete with the worlds best players in blitz. In speed-chess on a fast pc they can compete with everyone maybe except from the top five or so. In tournament-level it is still along way to go.... Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.