Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 21:17:30 07/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2004 at 19:06:46, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On July 13, 2004 at 19:01:14, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Well, then you should have used the parallel thing OR, > >By saying "you should have used the parallel thing" you assume that I actually >had a "parallel thing" and "chose" not to use it. Where did that assumption come >from? If I were given a quad Opteron I would have gladly used it. > What exactly do you want Omid? (1) Because you don't have a quad Opteron nobody be allowed to use one, or (2) Everyone be given a quad Opteron? Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.