Author: Reynolds Takata
Date: 21:41:20 12/27/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 1998 at 21:23:58, Joe T. Pangilinan wrote: > I have Fritz 5.16, and awaiting for the Fritz5.32 Upgrade. I am thinking >about getting the Hiarcs 6.0 Engine Module, since It had an excellent review as >being the most humanlike in it's Game analysis. Has anybody made comparison as >far as the accuracy of analysis between these 3 Fritz Engines? (e.g. Hiarcs 6.0 >Module, Junior 5, and Fritz 5.32.) > I would appreciate for any advice. Happy Holidays Everyone! I certainly don't want to get caught up in a Hiarcs 6 debate, but i must say that i'm amazed that it's in the top 3. I give it about 5th place. This stuff about most human, in it's case is hogwash, unless that means it makes as many losing blunders as humans. Any top 10 program is strong, so with Hiarcs 6 it's especially about style. I personally think it's a losing style, however it's good to have several engines in one interface for a second opinion, it;s much easier to change engines, without having to export pgn or resetup a position, so for that it's great. I personally would wait save up and go for hiarcs 7(even though it's not an engine). Of course the hype anout it could be somewhat faulty as in the case of Mchess 8 with it's dissapointing SSDF rating.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.