Author: David Dahlem
Date: 16:07:13 07/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2004 at 17:46:16, F. Huber wrote: >On July 27, 2004 at 16:17:13, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On July 27, 2004 at 14:14:45, Gopikrishna wrote: >> >>>How many plies its taking for your engines to find the mate score for this >>>position? >>>6kr/1b2bp1p/p6Q/Pp2p3/1q3p2/4B1N1/2PR2PP/6K1 w - - 0 33 >> >>[D]6kr/1b2bp1p/p6Q/Pp2p3/1q3p2/4B1N1/2PR2PP/6K1 w - - 0 33 >>Chest UCI: >>CPU: Windows ME - Pentium 3 - 933 mhz - 128mb Ram >>FEN: 6kr/1b2bp1p/p6Q/Pp2p3/1q3p2/4B1N1/2PR2PP/6K1 w - - >>Search for Mate ... (Hash=31MB) >>Mate in 9 found ! (1 Solution in 03:29) >> 9 03:30 M9 33.Nf5 Qb1+ 34.Kf2 Bh4+ 35.Qxh4 fxe3+ 36.Nxe3 Qe1+ 37.Kxe1 h6 >>38.Rd8+ Kg7 39.Nf5+ Kg6 40.Qg4+ Kf6 41.Rd6+ >> >>Regards >>Dave > >Hi Dave, > >try it with PopeyeUCI ... ;-) > >Set ´Threat=-2´ (i.e. to Auotmatic), and you´ll have the result in >about 3 secs! (that´s another good example for mate threats) > >BTW, in the line of you ChestUCI output >>Search for Mate ... (Hash=31MB) >I´m missing the search depth!? >Normally this should look like >>Search for Mate in xx ... (Hash=31MB) > >What have you done with your ChestUCI copy? ;-) > >Regards, >Franz. Hi Franz Sorry about the strange, incomplete post. Aol crashed while it was being sent. I do have Popeye UCI, but haven't had time to learn how to use it yet. :-) I haven't done anything with ChestUCI. I simply edited the line that said "Search for Mate in 62" when i posted. I thought it might look funny, and someone would ask me why i was searching for a "Mate in 62". :-) Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.