Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 07:32:59 08/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2004 at 10:20:07, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 03, 2004 at 10:11:07, Dan Honeycutt wrote: > >>Did I miss something? > >Just read all messages and if it's still not clear then I give up. > >-- >GCP I see 3 options discussed. //1 - Sort by Victim value = victim_value; //2 - Sort by Victim - Attackor value = victim_value - attackor_value; //3 - Sort by Victim then Attackor. any of: value = victim_value - attackor_index; //GCP method, index = value/100 value = victim_value *10 - attackor_value; //TSCP method value = (victim_value << 10) - attackor_value; //Cozzie method You and Anthony agree that 3 is best. I think 2 is best if you are going to use SEE for value <= 0, but for MVV/LVA only I agree that 3 is best. That's pretty much everything I see in the thread. But don't give up - if I missed something just give me the name of the poster and I'll reread. Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.