Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: [OT] Development Release: Mandrakelinux 10.1 beta 1 [OT]

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 15:56:04 08/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 10, 2004 at 18:16:02, Eugene Nalimov wrote:

>On August 10, 2004 at 13:41:18, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On August 10, 2004 at 12:58:22, Eugene Nalimov wrote:
>>
>>>On August 10, 2004 at 02:38:33, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>
>>>>...
>>>>
>>>>I am hardly a "Windows Guru" either, but I am learning the more technical
>>>>aspects of the operating system as a result of using Linux. When configuring
>>>>drivers, desktops, and application in Linux, learning the scripting value in
>>>>Windows almost seems required. It is actually 200 times easier believe it or
>>>>not.
>>>
>>>The difference is probably due to the fact that I am not "configuring drivers,
>>>desktops, and application" in Windows. Strange, but it just works.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Eugene
>>>
>>>>Peter
>>
>>
>>I would agree, within limits.  Windows 95/98/ME were pieces of trash that
>>crashed more than they ran.  Windows NT (and its derivatives) have been
>>rock-solid here (including XP).  Our windows labs have been using NT/2000/XP
>>since they were distributed and our only problems have been the occasional
>>virus-related gaffe here and there...
>
>For Windows 95/98/ME priorities were different. Backwards compatibility was much
>more important than stability. The user should be able to run his old DOS TSR
>program (do you remember those animals?) or old program that access any hardware
>directly. With those requirements there were no way to reliably isolate
>processes from hardware or from each other.
>
>Also those Windows should be able to run GUI interface on PCs with limited
>resources.
>
>You may not like those decisions but you should understand why they were made.
>
>Thanks,
>Eugene


I understand the issues, yes.  Although I am not sure I totally agree with them
as justification for producing something that was less than reliable for a group
of users that are definitely less than sophisticated computer experts. :)

But NT has run on all sorts of machines as well with no problems...  too bad it
didn't become _the_ system until lately...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.