Author: Volker Böhm
Date: 11:22:50 08/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2004 at 03:21:53, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On August 10, 2004 at 13:22:55, Volker Böhm wrote: > >[snip] > >>>>1. A "Const" Class holding only constants that do not need memory (no const >>>>fields). Nearly every class is derived from the const class giving it the >>>>opportunity to access all relevant constant values. > >Just noticing this now: you _derive_ from that const class? That sounds like the >wrong concept to me in this case. Why not simply include its headerfile and use >access the const values this way? > >Sargon Why is the concept wrong? Both solutions are nearly identical.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.