Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Verified Null-moving

Author: Tor Lattimore

Date: 04:33:23 08/12/04

Go up one level in this thread

Testing with WAC it seems to make very little difference between R=3, R=2 or R=3
with verrification, even thought the average ply difference is quite different.
This leads me to think that R=2 or adaptive based on remaining ply is probobly
my best bet, but I think i'll do some longer time control tests to see if that
makes a difference.
Cheers
Tor

• Re: Verified Null-moving Anthony Cozzie 06:25:11 08/12/04
  • Re: Verified Null-moving Uri Blass 08:10:58 08/12/04
  • Re: Verified Null-moving Stuart Cracraft 07:20:10 08/12/04
  • Re: Verified Null-moving Tord Romstad 06:31:15 08/12/04
    • Re: Verified Null-moving Dan Honeycutt 19:56:21 08/12/04
    • Re: Verified Null-moving Anthony Cozzie 07:33:38 08/12/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.