Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 16:51:14 08/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 2004 at 18:57:00, Sean Empey wrote: >On August 12, 2004 at 13:43:12, Richard Pijl wrote: > >>On August 12, 2004 at 13:34:55, Dan Ellwein wrote: >> >> >>>[D]1rr5/1b3p1k/4pb1p/8/Bq2pN2/4P3/R4PPP/2RQ2K1 w - - 0 30 >>> >>> 30. Rb1? >> >>The Baron 1.4.0 needs less than 2 seconds on a P4-2.4 to avoid Rb1: >> >> ply time nodes score pv >> 4( 8)& 0:00.05 11563 -0.02 Rc1xc8 Rb8xc8 Nf4-h5 Bf6-g5 Qd1-g4 >> 4( 8). 0:00.11 17798 -0.02 Rc1xc8 Rb8xc8 Nf4-h5 Bf6-g5 Qd1-g4 >> 5( 9)& 0:00.27 45114 -0.14 Ba4-c2 Qb4-c4 Ra2-a7 Bf6-b2 Ra7-a4 >> 5(10)& 0:00.33 55284 +0.16 Rc1-b1 Qb4-e7 Qd1-h5 Bb7-a6 Ba4-c2 >> 5(10). 0:00.38 65253 +0.16 Rc1-b1 Qb4-e7 Qd1-h5 Bb7-a6 Ba4-c2 >> 6(11)& 0:00.71 125731 -0.02 Rc1-b1 Qb4-a5 Ra2-d2 Rc8-c7 Rd2-d7 Rc7xd7 >> 6(12)& 0:01.86 288598 +0.04 Ba4-c2 Qb4-b5 Rc1-b1 Qb5-c4 Qd1-h5 Kh7-g8 >> 6(12). 0:02.19 355538 +0.04 Ba4-c2 Qb4-b5 Rc1-b1 Qb5-c4 Qd1-h5 Kh7-g8 >> 7(13)& 0:04.61 829896 +0.32 Ba4-c2 Kh7-g8 Rc1-b1 Qb4-c5 Nf4-h5 Bf6-e7 >> Qd1-g4 Qc5-g5 >> 7(13). 0:05.11 938694 +0.32 Ba4-c2 Kh7-g8 Rc1-b1 Qb4-c5 Nf4-h5 Bf6-e7 >> Qd1-g4 Qc5-g5 >> 8(16)& 0:13.07 2543381 +0.22 Ba4-c2 Rc8-c4 Qd1-h5 Rb8-f8 Rc1-d1 Qb4-c5 >> Rd1-d7 Qc5xh5 >> 8(16). 0:15.43 3089680 +0.22 Ba4-c2 Rc8-c4 Qd1-h5 Rb8-f8 Rc1-d1 Qb4-c5 >> Rd1-d7 Qc5xh5 >> 9(17)& 0:36.91 7385074 +0.22 Ba4-c2 Kh7-g8 Qd1-g4 Kg8-f8 Rc1-d1 Qb4-c4 >> Bc2-b1 Rc8-d8 Ra2-d2 Rd8xd2 >> 9(17). 0:44.49 9124352 +0.22 Ba4-c2 Kh7-g8 Qd1-g4 Kg8-f8 Rc1-d1 Qb4-c4 >> Bc2-b1 Rc8-d8 Ra2-d2 Rd8xd2 > > >Does it keep Bc2-b1 if you search longer? Storm also finds it fast but switches >to RD1 farther into the search. > I'm afraid the Baron loses Bc2 too, and switches to Rb1 again. I didn't let it run long enough to see whether it would get back to Bc2. Richard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.