Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: c,c++5,c#.

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 18:04:51 08/12/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 12, 2004 at 17:12:38, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>On August 12, 2004 at 16:19:06, Russell Reagan wrote:
>
>>On August 12, 2004 at 16:11:04, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>>
>>>A good C++ program cannot run faster than a good C program doing same thing.
>>>Just like a good C program cannot run faster than a good Assembly program doing
>>>same thing.
>>
>>Theoretically true. Practically false.
>
>For computer chess: true.
>
>anthony

So you're telling me that there has never been, and never will be a computer
chess program written in C that was faster than the equivalent assembly version,
and that there has never been, and never will be a computer chess program
written in C++ that was faster than the equivalent C program?

If that's what you're telling me, then you're wrong. It happens. Optimizing
compilers make it so.

• Re: c,c++5,c#. Omid David Tabibi 18:35:28 08/12/04
  • Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 21:47:17 08/12/04
    • Re: c,c++5,c#. Omid David Tabibi 02:10:59 08/13/04
      • Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 06:53:29 08/13/04
        • Re: c,c++5,c#. Anthony Cozzie 08:50:13 08/13/04
          • Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 12:06:00 08/13/04
            • Re: c,c++5,c#. Peter Fendrich 12:31:12 08/13/04
      • Re: c,c++5,c#. Per Steneskog 05:32:18 08/13/04
        • Re: c,c++5,c#. Omid David Tabibi 06:02:30 08/13/04
          • Re: c,c++5,c#. Per Steneskog 06:11:41 08/13/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.