Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 22:03:42 08/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 2004 at 21:40:38, Omid David Tabibi wrote: Where are you getting your facts Omid? >So you want... No, I don't want. Did you even read my post? I said that I did not recommend using C# for a chess program, and that in the long run it is better to use something else (like C or C++) because the rapid development advantage of a language like C# fades when the project is drawn out over years or decades. >to be crippled by a slow language... Maybe it's slower now. Maybe it won't be in the future. >which is owned by one company... I don't know if "owned" is the right word. It certainly hasn't stopped people from developing C# compilers for other platforms. >and can run only on the OS offered by that company... Guess you never heard of Mono or DotGNU huh? >for your entire life? None of the things you mentioned (even the one fact you got right) are "forever". >"early stages" or through the engine's entire life?! I really don't know what you're talking about. I have a feeling you really missed my point, or misread something.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.