Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: c,c++5,c#.

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 12:10:45 08/14/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 14, 2004 at 13:19:33, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On August 14, 2004 at 05:38:08, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>There is one thing I don't like about this approach, I'd be sitting with the
>>knowledge that a program like this would have to be rewritten entirely at some
>>point.
>
>If you followed that advice, why would you have to rewrite everything? You would
>be mostly reorganizing things, and only rewriting hot spots. You can't avoid
>rewriting hot spots no matter which approach you take.

Because of:
"3. Write abstract code that hides the implementation details when possible."

Depends to what extent you mean that of course, but in the extreme (virtual
functions etc..) I'm afraid it will be dreadfully slow.

-S.

• Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 22:52:31 08/14/04
  • Re: c,c++5,c#. Sune Fischer 03:24:16 08/15/04
    • Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 06:00:32 08/15/04
      • Re: c,c++5,c#. Sune Fischer 07:46:51 08/15/04
        • Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 21:04:08 08/15/04
          • Re: c,c++5,c#. Sune Fischer 00:16:19 08/16/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.