Author: Axel Schumacher
Date: 08:51:36 08/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2004 at 04:28:32, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 20, 2004 at 03:44:40, F. Huber wrote: > >>On August 20, 2004 at 02:19:55, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Hi Axel >>>Why on earth are people creating CM-settings >>>without considering that they should be based >>>on a possible original setting under CM-GUI? >>>Kurt >> >>Hello Kurt, >> >>the answer is very simple: >>Because not everybody is as fanatic as you with regard to only using >>settings, which also the CM-GUI would allow! >>The ´chess playing part´ is TheKing and not the GUI! >> >>Regards, >>Franz. > > > Hello Franz > Correct statement of you. As already mentioned > many times already: As a serious tester, I want > to know what I am doing and why a program plays > strong(er) or weak(er). > Kurt Why would you know more when using the CM-GUI or the CM settings? How the values derive from the CM-GUI entry are quite obvious, only the finetuning is not so easy (but possible). Essential is how the King engine interprets the input; and that I prefer to test in the CB-GUI. To change the parameter (and hence to test test the parameter) is much more easy with the wb2uci adaptor.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.