Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: working set is < 384k (another correction)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:35:08 08/21/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 2004 at 20:49:26, Jeremiah Penery wrote:

>On August 21, 2004 at 17:31:27, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>BTW 384K is wrong.  If something is in L1, it is most likely in L2 as well.  L1
>>is a most-recently-used subset of L2 just as L2 is a most-recently-used subset
>>of main memory...
>
>In Intel processors, L2 cache is inclusive of L1 cache.  Not so in AMD
>processors.


How so?  How do you get something into L1 without it also first coming into L2?




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.