Author: Alessandro Scotti
Date: 08:34:31 08/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2004 at 11:24:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On August 24, 2004 at 10:40:15, Alessandro Scotti wrote: > >>Ok but then you don't propagate the mate score out of the quiesce, right? > >And why not? Well if I knew why I wouldn't be asking! (*) :-) For now my reason is: there is no proof that a score is mate out of quiesce, because quiesce doesn't examine all possible moves but only part of them. After reading several replies this doesn't seem to be a popular opinion, though, but that's how I see things at present... (*) Hope English tenses are correct here!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.