Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: An alternative suggestion

Author: Francesco Di Tolla

Date: 05:09:01 08/26/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 26, 2004 at 06:31:00, Andrei Fortuna wrote:

>On August 25, 2004 at 18:36:08, Andreas Guettinger wrote:
>>Which brings us back to a php or vBulletin type board, where all the responses
>>are listed one after the other and there is no need to requote the previous
>>poster.
>
>If you count the additional overhead incured by all the fancy html formatting I
>bet you will get higher numbers than actual text-only format that is used at
>CCC.
>
>But come on, I think it's a bit silly to think that replies consume such amount
>of bandwidth ! As I said before : when I hosted CCC Search I got around 30
>MB/day max in a busy day IIRC. And here in Romania the bandwidth is very
>expensive, but outside I saw offers under $50/month which provide unlimited and
>decent bandwidth.
>
>Andrei
>
>P.S. Indeed I found an extreme case where someone posted a 600 KB message some
>time ago with many many matches analysed by fritz but this is an exception.

well images are loaded and cached, they don't add such a big overload. Instead a
php bulletin board allows to include a zipped file, so when you want to share a
set of games it will save a lot of bandwith



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.