Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why Did Junior Underperform So Badly In Bilbao?

Author: Pallav Nawani

Date: 11:01:50 10/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 12, 2004 at 10:28:16, Graham Laight wrote:


>Then we have Junior - which flopped. What was it doing in the computer team? It
>was the only computer to get a negative score against the humans - and was well
>short of what its team-mates achieved (see
>http://www.ajedrezbilbao.com/cResultadosEN.htm).
>
>How does one explain such a poor performance by Junior, which had massively
>superior hardware to Fritz?  Should we ask the Junior programmers to forward
>their program to to Franz Morsch for advice and improvement?
>
>-g

It is the Sulk effect. People tend to think that computer programs are inhuman
and will perform at the same level time after time. Not true! Sometimes programs
get annoyed and go into a sulk. When in such a mood, they don't play well.
Junior seems to be a bit annoyed about its name. I mean, its high time the world
computer chess champion should be renamed to 'Senior'!

PS: This is a silly attempt at humor.

Best regards
Pallav



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.