Author: Alessandro Scotti
Date: 15:59:12 11/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2004 at 17:50:14, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >Hi folks, > >i want to pickup a new idea or a old problem with the current wb2 >protocol. > >... > >What happend if all engines know which wb2 GUI will be used ? That would be >wonderfull and the engine __CAN__, not __must__, support special features of >this GUI. > >This include all aspects about the protocol, information strings and other >stuff. I think that would defeat the purpose of having a standard protocol in the first place. One could even add a "gui uci" extension and transform XBoard in UCI... >-Example:<br> >-Winboard / Xboard send:<br> >-xboard\n<br> >-gui xboard 4.2\n<br> >-protover 2\n<br> Shouldn't that be something like: xboard protover 3 ...engine responds with something like "feature gui=1" gui xboard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.