Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Immortal game? Qc7?! analyse by S8 (Be7!)

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 16:06:22 11/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 2004 at 18:39:21, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 10, 2004 at 18:15:51, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>On November 10, 2004 at 06:30:11, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On November 10, 2004 at 00:40:07, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 09, 2004 at 17:10:02, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You are missing the point, Chandler.
>>>>>
>>>>>You probably played through the game with Shredder 8 on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I did NOT PLay through the game!
>>>>I started on Black's move 10, turned on 'infinite analysis'
>>>>3 lines. It found 11.a3 and 11.h5  almost immediatly.
>>>>I decreased the 3rd line, and let the other two run.
>>>>I then 'clipped' the analysis & Posted it.
>>>>There was NO learning!
>>>
>>>If what you say is correct then there is some bug in shredder8 because it may
>>>start in real games to analyze 3 lines and later reduce the number of lines to
>>>find a better move.
>>>
>>>Shredder8 is the best program and I tend not to believe in that possibility.
>>>Maybe you analyzed the game with shredder8 earlier and you do not remember it
>>>but shredder8 remember.
>>>
>>>Another possiblity is that there is a bug in shredder8 and you cannot trust it's
>>>analysis when you give it 3 options first and later reduce it.
>>
>>No.. I just delete one of the main lines.. and focus on what it considers the
>>two best lines.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Another possibility is that you gave shredder8 to run for some hours with the 2
>>>possibilities so it has enough time to analyze and see that h5 is better.
>>
>>Only a few minutes..
>>
>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>With Multiple analysis "Main Lines"  played and evaluated simultaneous, it finds
>>11.h5 very quickly.
>>
>>Please read the Chessbase Manual.
>>It's speed is awesome.
>
>I do not need to read the chessbase manual to know that program with 2 options
>are slower relative to one option.

As you say.. or was it Einstein...
Speed is relative?
;)
CY

>
>If they were faster with 2 options then the engine could calculate 2 options and
>ignore the inferior option and play better.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.