Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 05:38:05 01/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 1999 at 06:18:15, Harald Faber wrote: >Hi all, > >So now it is done, 40 games were played with the following result: > >Genius3-MCP7: 9.0-11.0 >MCP7-Genius3: 7.0-13.0 > >Sum: Genius3(!!) won 22-18. > >Conditions were: > >Genius3: AMD-K6-200, 32MB hash, tournament book (!) >MChessPro7.1: Intel166MMX, 40MB hash >(Genius3 had 50% speed advantage) I do not understand why this result surprises you. Take a look at the latest SSDF Rating list: 6 MChess Pro 7.1 38MB P200 MMX 2512 27 -26 714 59% 2447 10 Genius 5.0 DOS 41MB P200 MMX 2496 25 -25 788 58% 2438 18 Genius 5.0 DOS Pentium 90 MHz 2426 20 -20 1164 52% 2414 20 Genius 3.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2410 26 -25 759 62% 2320 On a Pentium 90 MHz, the difference between Genius 3 and Genius 5 is 16 rating points. The difference between M7 and G5 on a P200 MMX is also 16 points. On identical hardware, we can therefore assume that the rating difference between M7 and G3 is around 32 points. When you give G3 a 50% speed advantage, your result is not at all unexpected. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.