Author: Will Singleton
Date: 08:24:31 12/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2004 at 09:51:15, Jon Dart wrote: >I prefer longer time controls generally. But personally, if there's a tradeoff, >I'd rather have a shorter basic time control and longer increment. The reason is >that if the game does go into a long endgame (but not into tablebases), with >both engines low on time, you're going to be playing it at blitz speed, which >gives you a decision all right, but not necessarily good play. Maybe in this >case we could compromise and do 50+5? Although I still like 45 10 better. > >--Jon 50+5 might be a good compromise. Even if a game gets up to 120 moves, that's still a max of 2 hours.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.