Author: Paul Massie
Date: 17:00:25 01/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 1999 at 18:46:20, Dan Kiski wrote: >On January 20, 1999 at 18:06:39, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On January 20, 1999 at 16:43:31, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On January 20, 1999 at 15:31:40, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >>> >>> >>>>1. According to Kasparov 24. ... cxd4 was a mistake and Black should >>>> have played 24. ... Kb6 instead. Maybe there is a computer program >>>> that refrains from taking the rook, finding the move 24 ... Kb6? >>> >>>The line of Fritz5.16 after an hour is 24.Rxd4 Kb6 25.Nb3 Bxd5 26.Qxd6+ Rxd6 >>>27.Rd2 Rhd8 28.Red1 Ne8 >>>The evaluation is 0.03 pawn advantage for black at depth 14. >>> >>>Uri >>Junior5's line at depth 16 after looking at 258469 Knodes(after 29 minutes and 6 >>seconds): >>24...Kb6 25.Nb3 Rhe8 26.Rxe8 Nxe8 27.c4 Qxf4 28.Rxf4 bxc4 29.Nd2 Bd5 30.Nxc4+ >>Bxc4 31.Rxc4 Nd6 32.Rc1 with 0.26 pawn advantage for black >> >>Uri > I ran Junior5 and Fritz5.32 for almost three hours. After more than 3 billion nodes, Junior considered the position dead even and gave the following line: Junior 5.0: 30...Rhe8 31.Rb6 Ra8 32.Rc6 Re2 33.Bc8 Ra7 34.Rc5 Qd1+ 35.Ka2 Rxc2+ 36.Qxc2+ Qxc2+ 37.Rxc2 Nd7 38.Rc6 Ne5 39.Rf6 a5] Unfortunately, I lost the Fritz analysis, but it was showing .6 of a pawn in White's favor after its chosen move of Qc4. Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.