Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 13:37:58 12/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2004 at 08:57:14, Mike Hood wrote: >On December 31, 2004 at 08:49:47, eric guttenberg wrote: > >>I don't get it...how does being 2d in the list show s7.04 is stronger than >>S8 which is first in the list? A single point difference is statistically >>insignificant of course but it does not show that "second" beats "first". >>Does it? >> >>eric > >It doesn't show that Shredder 7.04 is stronger than Shredder 8.0, but it does >show that Shredder 8.0 isn't stronger than Shredder 7.04. The results are so >close that statistically no difference in strength can be proved either way. > >As far as I'm concerned, Stuart can stick with his opinion that Shredder 7.04 is >stronger. He has every right to cling to his opinion until someone proves him >wrong. > Shredder 7.04 and 8 are almost equal in strenght. Shredder 8 is probably better but it is only a bit. Happy New Year to all ! Tanya Deborah. >P.S. Happy New Year to everyone :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.