Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Analysis question for these 2 EPD positions

Author: Anthony Cozzie

Date: 08:01:07 01/09/05

Go up one level in this thread


Zappa is not much of a mate solver, but these are both pretty simple.

[D]1b3rk1/pp4pp/2p3n1/1P1p4/P2P2q1/R4NPb/3NBK2/3QR3 b - -

1... Qg4xd4 2. Ra3-e3 Bb8xg3 3. Kf2-g1 Qd4xe3 4. Kg1-h1 Bh3-g2 5. Kh1xg2 Qe3-f2
6. Kg2-h1 Rf8-f5 7. Be2-f1 Rf5-h5 8. Bf1-h3 Rh5xh3 9. Nf3-h2 Qf2xh2
 = (MAT9)	Depth: 9/29	00:00:02.46	562kN (229 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts)

[D]1b3rk1/pp4pp/2p3n1/1Pqp4/P2P4/R4NPb/3NBK2/3QR3 b - -

1... Qc5xd4 2. Ra3-e3 Bb8xg3 3. Kf2-g1 Qd4xe3 4. Kg1-h1 Bh3-g2 5. Kh1xg2 Qe3-f2
6. Kg2-h1 Rf8-f5 7. Be2-f1 Rf5-h5 8. Bf1-h3 Rh5xh3 9. Nf3-h2 Qf2xh2
 = (MAT9)	Depth: 9/27	00:00:01.21	239kN (197 KN/s, 0 splits, 0 aborts)

Considering that the PVs are the same, I wonder why the 1st one took longer (I
cleared the hash table in between runs).

anthony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.