Author: KarinsDad
Date: 14:21:23 01/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 1999 at 17:16:25, Will Singleton wrote: > >On January 22, 1999 at 16:13:14, KarinsDad wrote: > >>One thing I am unclear on. >> >>Was the fictionally named BillClinton playing against computers in some of these >>games. For example: >> >>Hossa in games 2, 6, 7 and 8 >>GODMODE in games 9 and 10 >>TayxBot in games 19 and 20 >> >>These opponents took 0 seconds per move for many moves, so they appeared to be >>computers. Is there a lag problem which would cause a mis-report of 0 seconds? I >>do not know of one. >> >>Amateur in game 3 took 1 second per move for many moves. It appeared to be a >>computer taking a full second per move, but if so, why did it need to in the >>opening (unless it had no opening book). A human should have taken at least 2 >>seconds on some of the moves. This was somewhat strange. >> >>KarinsDad > >KD, > >Sharp eyes, there. Yes, Hossa, Godmode, Tayxbot and Amateur are computers. The >reason Amateur takes a second to move in the openings is that it has no >timestamp; the others have timestamp. All the move times look appropriate. That would explain it. Amateur was the one that was real confusing. Thanks Will. KarinsDad :) > >If lag is bad, or a transmission problem exists with my ISP, I can easily lose >on time. > >Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.