Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 03:37:42 01/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2005 at 02:42:48, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >On January 13, 2005 at 05:48:52, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>On January 12, 2005 at 23:43:58, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >> >>>On January 12, 2005 at 17:47:48, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>On January 12, 2005 at 13:57:14, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >>>> >>>>>What I am trying to say is I don't care what the number is. I picked 100 >>>>>because it was nice, round, and big. The *POINT* is that I think the 6-man >>>>>tables will be a much bigger strength gain then the 5-man tables. I think it >>>>>will be quite considerable; time will tell what the actual number is. >>>>> >>>>>I can't stand people who can't see the big picture and get caught up on every >>>>>stupid detail. >>>>> >>>>>anthony >>>> >>>>I can't stand people that thknk 6 man EGTB's are the "ultimate" >>>>Material WILL change; then, you are BACK to the 5 Piece EGTB's! >>>>What is sooo hard to understand? >>>>Tooo complicated for ya? >>> >>>I dont think you seem to understand the programmatic value of EGTB - so it would >>>be quiet pointless for you to argue in this case ! >>>Am I right ? :) >>> >>>I can underttand a discussion w.r.t the latency from IO to computatinal >>>efficiency of "evaluating" perfecting , etc - but your arguments are quiet >>>"different" and hilarious ;) >>> >>>Mridul >> >>Mridul - >> >>you seem to have mistaken this place for a computer chess club. It is the >>technical discussion which would be "different" here - maybe even hilarious ... >> >>:) >> >>Vas > > >Seeing the long threads above - I think I am begining to appreciate your >comments more , though you meant it as a joke :) >The archives have brilliant discussions (some of which are "hot" , but brilliant >nonetheless) on technical aspects of chess programming - nowadays I dont see >much of that happening. >I am partly to blame (like maybe all of us ?!) - I dont post anything much >myself :( > >Mridul I know what you mean - the CCC archives are really great. What happened to this place? One problem is - once you understand something, it's not that interesting to post about it. I usually only post about things I haven't understood yet :) Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.