Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 10:10:36 01/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
Another way to see this is consider in another way the concept "solution". You make of it equal to analyze every one of the possible moves. But It is necesary so? Each time we begin a game, we "solve" the narrow problem of that first move, doing a decent first move, discarding from the beginning things like a3 or h3 or so. In the second move, if we played the knight, we discard the move that bring the knight backward to its original place. I mean, if "to solve" is to get a complete set of patterns and lines capable of giving you the best every time and NMOt to see evety possible move, then the problem is lot lot more reachable by no so far computing power. In act we alrady see a glance of that in current nmodern chess, human and machine the same. Just look how openning get deeper and deeper and how entire liens are for sure dead lines, lines that take you to doom My bst Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.