Author: KarinsDad
Date: 11:04:47 01/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 1999 at 10:54:04, Albrecht Heeffer wrote: [snip] > >Hello all, > >It seems like a good time to introduce myself. I'm part of the Bionic team. >I provided the hardware, worked through the test sets, added the end-game >databases and did some optimisations. I was present at the Open Dutch during >the first weekend. > >Let me first clarify some things: > >1) You want data? There is a complete website explaining a lot of details >about Bionic. Please consult http://www.impakt.be/bionic/ There is >also explained what was added and changes to the Crafty version >we started from. > >2) All this was available before the start of the Open Dutch championship. >We did not hide anything. Bionic Impakt is for a large part based on >Crafty code, originally 9.26 and later based on 15.20. We never looked at >Crafty 16.x as some people suggested. If you want to compare, you'd >better use version 15.20 Hello Albrecht, Glad to meet someone new here, but sorry that my first response to you has to be an opposing point of view. This entire issue is extremely complex and controversial, but it really comes down to an issue of morality (not legality, not "we posted ahead of time", etc.). In the US, there are laws that state that a gift cannot be given to heads of corporations in order to make a business deal with them. In other parts of the world, these laws do not exist and these practices are encouraged. My point is that people in different parts of the world consider some actions as legal and/or moral and others do not. In the US, it is considered that someone who copies freeware software source, modifies it slightly, and re-sells it under a different name is doing something illegal. It is considered that someone who copies freeware software source, modifies it slightly, and does not re-sell it under a different name, but does use the software in a public domain is doing something immoral. Hence, the replies that you have seen previously. To me personally, it is a matter of fairness and personal integrity. Is it fair to use even a portion of someone else's years of hard work in a tournament designed for amateurs writing their own code? My answer is definitely not, regardless of posting a disclaimer on a web page. Your opinion of what is morally correct may differ. It doesn't matter to me if the programs play identically or as drastically different as possible, especially in a tournament designed for amateurs. I DO appreciate the amount of hard work your team has put into this program. I just feel morally uncomfortable on your approach. Remember the saying: If you get your material from a bunch of sources, it's research. If you get your material from a single source, it's plagerism. (And I realize that you got material from many sources, books, articles, code snippets, etc.; however, I was not being literal here). Something to chew on :) KarinsDad [snip] > >Good luck, > >Albrecht Heeffer
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.