Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 06:52:07 02/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2005 at 00:09:45, Daniel Shawul wrote: >Hello every one, > I read in the threads below that some people still suspect >danchess to be a clone. It is not a clone of any engine . If any body has any >doubts , he can ask me and i can send the source to a reliable person so that >it is checked. But please don't make posts here and there telling what you think >it is. > Danchess is participating in every other tournament because >it is found not to be a clone. In WBEC for example a group of people checked it >and found it not to be a clone so it is participating. There is no place ,at >least one that i know of, that danchess is not particaipating because of this >issue. >I have sent my source to Hyatt a couple of times but i do not know if he checked >it or not,becaues i have got no response. If he wants i can send it to him >again,but it will only be a waste of his time and mine since there is no >similarity. > My current version is as strong as crafty even better which i am very proud >of. Check the games at AEGT where danchess trashed crafty 7.5 - 2.5. >somepeople just like talking about others. I like to work rather than talk. >I am sorry if i sounded very pompous but that is not my intention. > >best wishes >daniel I've been quite impressed by the improvements in DanChess (including the parallel code), but 10 games is not _nearly_ enough to draw conclusions. I've seen Zappa beat Crafty 10 times in a row, and vice versa . . . . anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.