Author: Tony Werten
Date: 21:36:58 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 17:09:23, Joshua Haglund wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 17:03:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 10, 2005 at 14:16:50, Joshua Haglund wrote: >> >>>On February 10, 2005 at 14:06:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >>> >>>>On February 10, 2005 at 13:40:04, Joshua Haglund wrote: >>>> >>>>>Can anyone tell me if Squash kibitzes too much or too little? >>>>> >>>>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 7 nodes: 1.78m eval: 0.03 time: 4.49 >>>>>Squash(C) kibitzes: move g2g4 >>>>> >>>>>follow Squash >>>>> >>>>>Joshua Haglund >>>>>toneewa@yahoo.com >>>> >>>>Most people output what you have, but with the entire PV. Zappa does score + >>>>nps + depth + PV. Only the Australian programmers kibitz the entire contents of >>>>the hash table every move. >>>> >>>>anthony >>> >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 3 nodes: 1.61k eval: 0.65 time: 0.00 >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 4 nodes: 7.67k eval: 0.78 time: 0.02 >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 5 nodes: 52.19k eval: 0.94 time: 0.13 >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 6 nodes: 436.54k eval: 0.82 time: 1.13 >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: move f3e5 >>> >>>I actually kibitz anything over 1k nodes, but the pv. Wouldn't humans cheat by >>>using the pv? >>> >>>Joshua Haglund >>>toneewa@yahoo.com >> >>Just kibitz the _last_ search result before you make your move. If both >>programs kibitz every iteration, an endgame will be impossible to watch. Are >>you going to kibitz everything from ply 4 to ply 50 in fine#70? :) > >Yeah, I noticed this. I'm playing around with some ideas. Start kibitzing after 2 secs. Tony > >Joshua Haglund >toneewa@yahoo.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.