Author: Alan McCracken
Date: 00:07:29 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 20:53:53, John Merlino wrote: >On February 15, 2005 at 20:30:13, Alan McCracken wrote: > >>Again a position taken from one of my games. A game in 15. >> >>[D]r3k2r/1bp1bppp/pp2pn2/4N1B1/q2P4/3B4/PPP1QPPP/2KRR3 w kq - 0 13 >> >>Terry > >CM9_R1 on an AMD 2500 needs 1:37 to switch (back) to Nxf7. But the eval >difference between Nxf7 and Kb1 are only a few centipawns: > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 0.99 2496 13.Nxf7 O-O 14.Nh6+ gxh6 15.Qxe6+ > Kh8 >0:00 1/4 0.99 4965 13.Nxf7 O-O 14.Nh6+ gxh6 15.Qxe6+ > Kh8 >0:00 1/5 0.73 21254 13.Nxf7 Qxa2 14.Nxh8 Qa1+ 15.Kd2 > Qa5+ 16.c3 Qxg5+ 17.Kc2 >0:00 1/6 0.63 115498 13.Nxf7 Qxa2 14.Bxf6 Bxf6 15.Qh5 g6 >0:01 1/7 0.13 273083 13.Nxf7 Qxa2 14.c4 O-O 15.Bb1 Qa4 > 16.Nh6+ gxh6 17.Qxe6+ Kh8 >0:01 1/7 0.48 378521 13.Bc4 O-O 14.Ng4 Nd5 15.Bxe7 Nxe7 > 16.f3 Ng6 17.Bb3 >0:02 1/7 0.62 464602 13.Kb1 O-O 14.Ng4 Nd5 15.Bxe7 Nxe7 > 16.Be4 Nd5 17.Qf3 >0:03 1/8 0.50 805017 13.Kb1 O-O 14.Ng4 Nd5 15.Bxe7 Nxe7 > 16.Be4 Bd5 17.a3 Rad8 >0:11 1/9 0.46 2626142 13.Kb1 O-O 14.Ng4 Nd5 15.Bxe7 Nxe7 > 16.Qe5 Bxg2 17.Qxc7 Bf3 18.Qxe7 > Bxg4 >0:35 1/10 0.90 8516946 13.Kb1 O-O 14.c4 h6 15.Bxf6 Bxf6 > 16.Bc2 Qa5 17.Be4 Bxe4+ 18.Qxe4 > Rad8 >1:17 1/11 0.94 19091186 13.Kb1 O-O 14.c4 h6 15.Bxf6 Bxf6 > 16.Bc2 Qe8 17.Be4 Bxe4+ 18.Qxe4 > Qa4 19.Ka1 Bxe5 20.dxe5 >1:37 1/11 1.00 24569812 13.Nxf7 O-O 14.Qxe6 Rxf7 15.Bc4 > Bd5 16.Bxd5 Nxd5 17.Qxd5 Bxg5+ > 18.Kb1 Rf8 19.Qxg5 Rxf2 20.Rd2 >2:59 1/12 0.95 47326424 13.Nxf7 O-O 14.Qxe6 Rxf7 15.Bc4 > Bd5 16.Bxd5 Nxd5 17.Qxd5 c6 18.Qxf7+ > Kxf7 19.Rxe7+ Kg6 20.Bf4 Qxa2 > >jm I don't agree with the analysis of CM9_R1, after 13..0-0, I'd play 14.Ne5! with good attacking chances. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.