Author: blass uri
Date: 21:57:27 01/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 1999 at 00:41:05, greg moller wrote: >On January 27, 1999 at 17:49:51, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On January 27, 1999 at 14:26:46, Tony Hedlund wrote: >> >>> >>>Hi! >>> >>>We've got 206 new games at my URL: >>> >>>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/welcome.htm >> >>I looked at some games and I found that Hiarcs7 is weak at endgames >>It lost game 63 against Genius5(p90) in a dead draw position and it could not >>win game 77 with a knight advantage >> >>Hiarcs7 played 60.h4 and lost in game 63 in the following position: >>8/5p2/r3k3/4P1p1/6N1/5PPP/8/5K2 w - - 0 1 >>and could not win with black the following position in game 77 >>played Qxa4 and lost >>4q2k/2Q3p1/7p/p7/P6P/1n6/6PK/8 b - - 0 1 >> >>Uri > >are you implying it's weaker than hiarcs6 in the endgame? i assume you are >familiar with hiarcs6's reputation as a strong endgame player( i have hiarcs6 >and it plays much better on my PII-400 than on my P100). what hardware did you >run Hiarcs7 on ? > >regards, greg I did not run Hiarcs7. I only looked at the ssdf games(2 hours per 40 moves on pentium200MMX) I have not Hiarcs and it is my impression from the games Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.