Author: stuart taylor
Date: 00:55:19 02/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2005 at 12:30:57, Alan McCracken wrote: >On February 16, 2005 at 07:02:42, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On February 15, 2005 at 20:30:13, Alan McCracken wrote: >> >>You're simply giving a night for atleast 2 pawns with menacing attacking >>chances. What's daring? perhaps the loss of a pawn's worth of material which >>might be for nothing? >>S.Taylor > >Analize the position before you comment. Look at Black's Queen...Black can also >castle..and if the Night were accepted I would mate the Black King...not give up >a Night for two pawns. This is a difficult position for computers to evaluate >correctly, hence I posted it. Yes, sorry, I must admit that if black takes the night, it should look like much more than a night for 2 pawns. And then you have to check into if Black can do something back (in ANY event, after N:f7). S.Taylor > >Terry > > >> >>>Again a position taken from one of my games. A game in 15. >>> >>>[D]r3k2r/1bp1bppp/pp2pn2/4N1B1/q2P4/3B4/PPP1QPPP/2KRR3 w kq - 0 13 >>> >>>Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.