Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 06:52:36 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 03:41:05, Sune Fischer wrote: >On February 18, 2005 at 18:52:58, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>These assumptions are absolutely wrong. It is a common problem in this Forum of >>asserting things that I have not said. >> >>"Look the answer: 30% of the total score reached by Diep in testings and 25% of >>the total score reached by Zappa in private tests. The books was responsible of >>30% and 25% of the score reached for every mentioned engine. >>I'm not quite sure what that means actually." >> >>Example: If Diep played 10 games, and it won 10 games, 3 games were because of >>the book. Do you understand? A direct win because of the book. > >I'm just explaining that you can't translate that to an Elo number without >knowing how many games there were in total. > >If you play a total of 10 games and score 7 without book and 10 with book, your >score has improved from 70% to 100%(!!) which is a huge improvement (800 Elo). > >If you improved from 7% to 10% its a much smaller improvement (70 Elo). Really useless to explain again. I wont repeat what you cant understand. Sorry-. > >>AO-- >> >> >>I have not pointed out anything about any elo relation. > >Well that is the big question :) > >-S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.