Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computers and Shuffle Chess

Author: KarinsDad

Date: 15:08:20 01/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 28, 1999 at 12:24:59, Howard Exner wrote:

>On January 28, 1999 at 10:04:36, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On January 28, 1999 at 09:13:00, Howard Exner wrote:
>>
>>>>Try out shuffle-chess against Hiarcs e.g. and you'll see it overplays you in a
>>>>nice way. :-)
>>>
>>>They beat me consistently in normal chess already. I think in shuffle chess
>>>I would even do worse. All the familiar patterns for me would be gone.
>>>The computer on the other hand would just blissfully go about its
>>>calculating business.
>>
>>It is not only calculating...
>>
>>> What is the consensus on humans vs computers
>>>in shuffle chess? Would an IM for example have a better chance in regular
>>>or shuffle chess? Any data out there or opinions expressed by those who
>>>play shuffle chess?
>>
>>For IMs and GMs it should be easier to win because programs depend a lot on
>>their opening books. Look what they play withoug opening book. For us patzers
>>strong enough but masters know what and why they play...
>
>As we have moved away from the original topic I hope you don't
>mind that I changed the thread name. My way of thinking about humans vs
>computers at shuffle chess is different. Both are stripped of opening knowledge
>but who will be more at home in the chaos of the shuffle chess position?
>I liken it to composed problems. Computers treat these complex, weird looking
>positions no differently than they do other more familiar positions as
>those found in regular play. Humans on the other hand find such positions
>disorienting. For humans our strength in chess is to a larger degree dependent
>on pattern recognition and familiar themes. Computers while also
>having chess knowledge are known more for their number crunching
>skills.Therefore I think humans may suffer more from the chaotic shuffle chess
>opening position.
>
> I'm not sure how popular this form of chess is for IM's
>but if anyone has some games to share I'd be interested.

I agree. Additionally, if shuffle chess every became popular (heaven forbid:
from a diehard chess player), then the programs would be re-written in due time
to play better opening moves (as opposed to getting them out of a book which is
just easier to program).

KarinsDad



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.