Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Qualifier to my previous statement

Author: Matt Frank

Date: 11:39:16 01/29/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 29, 1999 at 14:00:02, KarinsDad wrote:

>By everything, I also meant opening books and tablebases. I personally do not
>feel that a program is stronger just because someone improved it's opening book.
>To me, that is like saying the program is stronger because someone put it on
>faster hardware.
>
>To do a true test of strength vs. strength, you have to have a controlled
>environment and minimize only one variable, i.e. the engine.
>
>KarinsDad

That's a peculiar statement. Do you mean to say that if we could somehow disable
Kasparov's opeing theory knowledge it would be a better test of him vs. me, and
our respective chess engines (i.e., brains). The way I see this you are imposing
a requirement that would require enourmous dilution in all of the commercial
software over the last 20 years.

Matt Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.