Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 03:07:59 02/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2005 at 01:06:37, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 28, 2005 at 00:00:23, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>Yes. It is _useless_ and manipulated. You dont have all the result neither all >>the games. Example: Patzer - Johnny, last round. > >Fine I will get the remaining games, do the test again, and guess what... Diep's >performance rating in the tournament will _still_ be low. > >Diep can finish ahead of someone and _still_ have a lower TPR. It is based on >it's opponents rating and how it finished. You used an incomplete pgn file. I see. I understand now: You sucked completetly with your data. > >You don't seem to be able to grasp that. > Using an incomplete pgn file.... You are not able to grasp a real data either. >>If you have generated a Elo based on an incomplete pgn file, you have >>manipulated the data. I resturn you the strik 2+2 = 4. > >What are you going to argue when I have the full pgn file? That saturn was >alligned with mars when I generated the elo? > Nothing. I realize it is a waste of time to read any of your message since you dont show anything reliable. >> >>>Diep's TPR (Tournament Performance Rating) for the event was 11th overall. It >>>officially placed 7th. >>> >>>What is so hard to understand about this? >>> >> >>No, if people were idiot, people would accept your manipulated table. > >It is not manipulated. Manipluated would be if I changed results to make it look >worse. I have done no such thing. I don't need to do anything to make Diep look >bad. It took care of that all by itself at the tournament. > >>PD: Apart of the fact that your table is a...., your accusations about being >>Vincent Diepeveen show the real person that you are. > >Show the real person I am? A reasonable one? You have not been reasonable accusing peole of usurping identities. > >Next time you pick an arguement with someone you better watch what is coming to >you. Not only will I prove the results, I am going to make you look like a >complete and utter fool over this. > Next time, dont try to argue a stupid elo list that doesnt show anything more than a cheap provocation. >I will show how I arrived at the average starting elo, the pgn in full so you >can run all the same tests, and once and for all prove that Diep's _performance_ >rating in the tournament was bad. > Ha! Other manipulated table?!!! >All you have done is piss me off with your useless babble... > Well, an attack direct to Diep and accusing me of being Diepeveen is an idiot bable on your behalf. What else, baby? Arturo.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.