Author: Theo van der Storm
Date: 15:09:49 03/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 2005 at 10:18:50, Lars Bremer wrote: >Hi Theo, > >>It's nice to see other people become interested in the game! > >Oh, I am interested in that game since almost 3 month :-) > >>It is more subtle then you (OR EVEN INGO!) thought. > >Seems so. Unfortunatly I was satisfied to beat Ingo in Paderborn and did not >notice that a new EinStein-Star was born there, otherwise I would have played >you. Right. Beating Ingo is just the first step in becoming a true stone-not-casting-dice :-) Don't get me wrong. I'm not anti-Rolling Stones. >May be we will have an EinStein-Match in Leiden. At least a few games should be possible. >Yep, I was wrong, sorry, I am a ..... The position was much more >complicate than I thought. Would you play this move over the board too? If yes, >you understand the game much deeper I will ever do. > >Lars Yes, I would have played it over the board too. Till now that would not be based on a three ply calculation, but on taking out the most forcefull X-threat in the position 4c2-d1. Having done this example of an end-game calculation and seeing the easy mathematics I should be able to calculate this over the board as well. In the middle game - like in chess - strategy and intuition play a bigger role. Theo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.