Author: KarinsDad
Date: 20:58:21 01/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 1999 at 23:51:30, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 29, 1999 at 23:36:40, KarinsDad wrote: >[snip] >>Are you analyzing only leaf nodes, or at you going through positions from the >>start of games? >> >>Please explain your numbers. 10^47 appears to be about 16 to 18 moves down for >>each side down considering all legal moves. Since about >>9.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 x 10^46 of those moves are >>inferior, it seems likely that you are more or less covering the bases as it is. >>What am I missing? If the opponent makes an inferior move, then let a program's >>tactical engine figure it out. If the opponent makes a theoretical novelty, let >>your learning routines record it and analyze it later. >KK made an interesting observation, and clearly he is right. You don't have to >compute every game, only every unique possible board position. I might be off >by a 6 orders of magnitude or so, but that would not matter much. >[snip] You still did not explain your numbers. Not all of us have been following the C.A.P. results. This is interesting. Please provide more detail. Thanks, KarinsDad
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.