Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 12:49:24 03/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2005 at 14:47:25, Tord Romstad wrote: >On March 09, 2005 at 14:36:46, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >> >> >>Hi Karl-Heinz, >>you must know that anybody who exposes a clone will be attacked by many. >>I would simply not reply to _any_ of their posts. > >Hi Matthias, > >I am no less forgiving towards clones than you are, but in this >particular case I cannot agree with you. Stating that a chess >engine is a clone is a serious accusation, and requires >substantial evidence. Claiming that "engine X is a clone of >engines Y/Z", where Y and Z are not even similar, and without >giving any evidence whatsoever, does not count as exposing >an engine as a clone. > >It is very possible that Toga is a clone. The tests done by >Heinz even makes it _likely_ that it is. Nevertheless, it >deserves the benefit of the doubt until we have some more >solid data. > >Tord Hi Tord, Glaurung is one of the strongest engines ! I hope it shall not be cloned. Thanks, Matthias.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.