Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Topalov defeated Kasparov

Author: Torstein Hall

Date: 12:59:19 03/10/05

Go up one level in this thread


On March 10, 2005 at 13:10:07, Eduard Nemeth wrote:

>In my eyes is the winner who won the direcctly Duell.
>
>German: in meinen Augen sollte die Feinwertung entscheiden, und wenn die gleich
>ist so sollte der direkte Vergleich zählen. Hat Garry Topalov besiegt auch?
>
>Wenn Ja, so soll er Sieger sein, wenn Nein, so ist für mich der wahre Sieger
>dann Topalov.
>
>Garry in only 30 moves to beat, that is very strong!!! Or?
>
>[Event "XXII Torneo Internacional de Linares"]
>[Site "Linares"]
>[Date "2005.03.10"]
>[Round "14"]
>[White "Topalov, Veselin"]
>[Black "Kasparov, Garry"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[ECO "B30"]
>[WhiteElo "2757"]
>[BlackElo "2804"]
>[PlyCount "59"]
>
>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 e5 4. Bc4 d6 5. d3 Be7 6. O-O Nf6 7. Nh4 Nd4 8. g3
>Bg4 9. f3 Be6 10. Bg5 Ng8 11. Bxe7 Nxe7 12. f4 exf4 13. Bxe6 fxe6 14. Rxf4 Kd7
>15. Nf3 Rf8 16. Rxf8 Qxf8 17. Nxd4 cxd4 18. Ne2 Qf6 19. c3 Rf8 20. Nxd4 Nc6 21.
>Qf1 Qxf1+ 22. Rxf1 Rxf1+ 23. Kxf1 Nxd4 24. cxd4 d5 25. Kf2 Ke7 26. Kf3 Kf6 27.
>h4 g6 28. b4 b5 29. Kf4 h6 30. Kg4 1-0
>
>Only 30 Moves !

30 moves means nothing, it was probably another 20 or so to checkmate. Kasparov
made a huge blunder in a drawn position. 21..Qd8 looked like a simple draw

Torstein


>
>
>
>On March 10, 2005 at 12:55:38, Ted Summers wrote:
>
>>Per Chessbase:
>>
>>The amazing answer is that nobody knew. We asked tournament officials and did
>>not get a definitive answer. We asked colleagues who mainly said they had been
>>meaning to ask us. And we asked Topalov himself, and he confessed that he did
>>not know. The only thing that appears to be certain is that the traditional SB
>>system will not be used, rather the number of won games is the first tiebreaker.
>>"But we would both have won the same number of games," said Veselin, "and then I
>>don't know what decides." Some people were sure that it was the number of black
>>wins, in which case Kasparov would already be the winner. But as we said, nobody
>>was sure. So apart from the very exciting game we expect to see on Thursday
>>there is the additional nervous pleasure of not knowing exactly what the outcome
>>will imply. Well, let's hope it has been figured out by the time of the
>>prize-giving ceremony – which by the way is also unclear. It was announced for
>>Friday, but that is a national day of mourning in Spain, so many expect it to be
>>held tomorrow evening after the final round. But as with so many other things
>>only time will probably tell...



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.