Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 12:20:48 02/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 1999 at 08:17:15, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 30, 1999 at 09:11:28, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>>CM6000 is better than CM5500, but is it better than CM5555(settings)? I'm not >>>sure it is. >>Yes it is 40/2h. It is our intention to include CM6000 on our list. >>We use 16mb hash and CM6000.obk. >>Mr de Koning told us that 16mb should be more than enough, because CM6000 is a >>very slow program. He also recommended the original settings. 32mb could make >>the program slightly slower. For shorter time-controls he recommended smaller >>hash-tables. >>Greetings Bertil! > >Are you aware how to set the hash size? Yes I got the instructions from Blass Uri. I have sent the ini. procedure to all our testers. We choosed 16mb hash because it was recommended by mr de Koning. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.