Author: Evgenii Manev
Date: 15:07:22 03/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 31, 2005 at 16:06:33, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 31, 2005 at 15:56:00, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On March 31, 2005 at 15:50:52, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On March 31, 2005 at 15:40:43, Dave Kuntzsch wrote: >>> >>>>These are preliminary results after Toga's first tournament. The Ku suffix >>>>Craftys are private compiles with modified source. They are experimental and not >>>>available for distribution. >>>> >>> >>>It's a lot stronger. Probably less than 1% of the code is modified. It just >>>goes to show how a few clever changes can have a big impact on strenght. In >>>this case, it looks like about 50 Elo. >>> >>>I would say that your subject line is highly misleading. >> >> I am much surprised that Toga (a clone or modified >> Fruit) seems to be accepted by most people. This >> was not the case with other programs in the past :-( > >I think that this one is a bit different, in that the author has now: >Complied with the terms of the legal license agreement (IIRC). >Admitted that it was a clone. >Apologized. yes Fruit 2.0 Toga seems to be stronger than Fruit 2.0 but that do not make it a separate program IMO we have to make a convention here in CCC to call it Fruit 2.0 Toga not just only Toga best regards, Geno
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.