Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human rating differential compared to Computer vs. computer

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 08:36:08 02/03/99

Go up one level in this thread


On February 02, 1999 at 11:23:19, KarinsDad wrote:
[snip]
>I do not doubt that gross blunders can be made. The problem is that when you
>compare the performance of a 2610 player against Kasparov vs. a 1800 player
>against Kasparov, you can make justifications and speculations all you want,
>however, Sokolov is much better prepared to win against Kasparov and the ELO
>prediction formula states that he should do it about 1 time in 4.
I think this kind of extrapolation is difficult to rely upon without a standard
deviation to go with it.  As with any probability function, the estimate is
reliable for huge numbers of trials (after all, the rising/falling players will
even out in such circumstances).  Plus you can have a freaky streak, just like
flipping twenty heads in a row.

BTW, what do you have as Sokolov's win/loss/draw ratio against G.K.?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.