Author: John Merlino
Date: 14:27:58 04/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2005 at 17:17:37, Tom Brake wrote: >On April 13, 2005 at 14:25:51, John Merlino wrote: > >>On April 13, 2005 at 12:24:40, pavel wrote: >> >>>[D] 3n4/rBp1p3/2P5/2PK4/k2N4/pp2R3/bppB2Rp/q1n1r1b1 w - - 0 1 > >This is very odd then, as I get this from CM9K on an Athlon 64: > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 -23.58 3320 1.Rc3 Re5+ 2.Kxe5 Bxd4+ 3.Kxd4 > h1=Q 4.Rc4+ Kb5 >0:00 1/4 -24.40 29618 1.Rc3 e6+ 2.Nxe6 Re5+ 3.Kxe5 Nd3+ > 4.Kd5 h1=Q >0:00 1/4 0.00 44003 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rc4+ Kb5 5.Rb4+ >0:00 1/5 0.00 74005 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rc4+ Kb5 5.Rb4+ >0:00 1/6 0.00 133023 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rc4+ Kb5 5.Rb4+ >0:01 1/7 0.00 319562 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rc4+ Kb5 5.Rb4+ >0:03 1/8 0.00 739682 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rc4+ Kb5 5.Rb4+ >0:08 1/9 Mate29 2068494 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rbe4+ Kb5 5.Nd4+ Ka4 6.Ne2+ Kb5 > 7.Nc3+ Ka5 8.Nxa2+ Kb5 9.Nc3+ Ka5 > 10.Ne2+ Kb5 11.Nd4+ Ka4 12.Nf3+ > Kb5 13.Rb4+ Ka5 14.Rbxb3+ Ka4 15.Rb4+ > Ka5 16.Rbe4+ Kb5 17.Nd4+ Ka4 18.Ne2+ > Kb5 19.Nc3+ Ka5 20.Na2+ Kb5 21.Ba6+ > Rxa6 22.Nc3+ Ka5 23.Ne2+ Kb5 24.Nd4+ > Ka4 25.Nf3+ Kb5 26.Rb4+ Ka5 27.Rb6+ > Ka4 28.Rxa6+ Kb5 29.Ra5# >0:12 2/10 Mate29 3367414 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rbe4+ Kb5 5.Nd4+ Ka4 6.Ne2+ Kb5 > 7.Nc3+ Ka5 8.Nxa2+ Kb5 9.Nc3+ Ka5 > 10.Ne2+ Kb5 11.Nd4+ Ka4 12.Nf3+ > Kb5 13.Rb4+ Ka5 14.Rbxb3+ Ka4 15.Rb4+ > Ka5 16.Rbe4+ Kb5 17.Nd4+ Ka4 18.Ne2+ > Kb5 19.Nc3+ Ka5 20.Na2+ Kb5 21.Ba6+ > Rxa6 22.Nc3+ Ka5 23.Ne2+ Kb5 24.Nd4+ > Ka4 25.Nf3+ Kb5 26.Rb4+ Ka5 27.Rb6+ > Ka4 28.Rxa6+ Kb5 29.Ra5# >0:34 2/11 Mate29 9736612 1.Rg4 h1=Q+ 2.Nf3+ Kb5 3.Rb4+ Ka5 > 4.Rbe4+ Kb5 5.Nd4+ Ka4 6.Ne2+ Kb5 > 7.Nc3+ Ka5 8.Nxa2+ Kb5 9.Nc3+ Ka5 > 10.Ne2+ Kb5 11.Nd4+ Ka4 12.Nf3+ > Kb5 13.Rb4+ Ka5 14.Rbxb3+ Ka4 15.Rb4+ > Ka5 16.Rbe4+ Kb5 17.Nd4+ Ka4 18.Ne2+ > Kb5 19.Nc3+ Ka5 20.Na2+ Kb5 21.Ba6+ > Rxa6 22.Nc3+ Ka5 23.Ne2+ Kb5 24.Nd4+ > Ka4 25.Nf3+ Kb5 26.Rb4+ Ka5 27.Rb6+ > Ka4 28.Rxa6+ Kb5 29.Ra5# Wow, that is odd. What personality are you using? I tried both the R1 and the default CM9000 personalities on my AMD 2500, and neither of them showed mate in under two minutes. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.