Author: chandler yergin
Date: 12:05:00 04/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2005 at 12:39:16, Matthew Hull wrote: >On April 20, 2005 at 12:15:58, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On April 20, 2005 at 08:44:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On April 20, 2005 at 07:59:35, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>On April 19, 2005 at 22:13:28, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 19, 2005 at 22:02:32, chandler yergin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>ahem ...(cough) -- I see you quoted Hsu's book and your putting things to rest. >>>>> >>>>>Was there any other point you were trying to make? >>>> >>>>It should be obvious that the few quotes given, refute the claims of Hyatt, >>>>exposes his obvious bias, and his libelous, ignorant, innaccurate, speculations >>>>and attempts to demean the greatest Chess Player in History! >>>>IMO, his lack of objectivity, & logic leaves much to be desired. >>>>He has taken things to a personal level with Posters that do not agree with some >>>>of his absurd comments. >>>>In regard to some of the technical apsects of Programming, he has misled >>>>with willful intent to deceive. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>care to explain the above characterization? The rules didn't require them to >>>give him printouts. They required them to give him all "publicly played games" >>>of which there were exactly _zero_ to give him. >> >>As I so Posted! >>"Pg 207 >> The match contract explicitly obliged the Deep Blue team to provide, when >>requested, the scores of all our public tournament games. >> >>"True, he did not have access to games played by the newest version of the >>program." >> >> What don't you understand here? > > >None of those games were "public tournament games". > >What don't YOU understand? > > > >> >>He asked that the Logs be given in a sealed Folder to the Arbiter for later >>examination. >> >>"Granting him direct access to Deep Blue's game logs would be equivilent to >>giving him Deep Blue's silicon head on a silver platter, with $700,000 on the >>side." >> >>> >>>Please learn to read, with a dictionary handy, so that you can understand what >>>is being said... >> >> >>> >>>then your childish comments won't make you look like an idiot... >> >>My Quote: >>"He has taken things to a personal level with Posters that do not agree with >>some of his absurd comments." >> >>Thanks for proving my point! >> >>"In regard to some of the technical aspects of Programming, he has misled >>with willful intent to deceive." >> >>and you have.. > > >Nobody here agrees with you on this. Speak for yourself only! Bob has told it straight on every point. No, he hasn't! Ask Thorsten, and read his Post! > >You are just in denial that Garry got his helmet handed to him by a machine. >Both he and you are sore losers. No, I am for "Fair Play". Honesty & Integrity on this Forum. Misleading, to the point of lying is unethical. Or, perhaps I should not attribute to malice, what can be explained by ignorance. > >:) > >Cheers, > > > >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>>...just wondering... >>>> >>>>Wonder no more.. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Best, >>>>> >>>>>Michael >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Let's put some stuff to rest here.. >>>>>> >>>>>>Quoting from FENG-HSIUNG HSU's Book >>>>>> >>>>>>"Behind Deep Blue" >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 207 >>>>>> The match contract explicitly obliged the Deep Blue team to provide, when >>>>>>requested, the scores of all our public tournament games. >>>>>> >>>>>>True, he did not have access to games played by the newest version of the >>>>>>program. >>>>>> >>>>>>We wanted to be fair, but to give Garry games from our pre-match training would >>>>>>have placed us at a serious disadvantage. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 219. >>>>>> >>>>>>The chess books I had only gave cursory treatments on the positional play of the >>>>>>Queen >>>>>>After this game Joe wrote some simple code on where the Queen should be placed. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 220. >>>>>> >>>>>>An automatic tuning run for the evaluation function pointed out to us that the >>>>>>weighting for one class of King Safety should be increased. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg224. >>>>>> >>>>>>The morning before game 2, the team debated whether we should make changes >>>>>>to Deep Blue's evaluation function. Joe had already 'fixed' the bug responsible >>>>>>for the last move in game 1, but there were other changes we needed to look >>>>>>into. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 238. >>>>>> >>>>>>The penalty for Bishops being shut out from the game was increased after this >>>>>>game. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 243. >>>>>> >>>>>>Granting him direct access to Deep Blue's game logs would be equivilent to >>>>>>giving him Deep Blue's silicon head on a silver platter, with $700,000 on the >>>>>>side. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, enough Quotes.. >>>>>>Read the BOOK!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.