Author: Matt Frank
Date: 16:23:30 02/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 1999 at 20:41:52, James T. Walker wrote: >On February 04, 1999 at 12:48:51, Matt Frank wrote: > >>On February 04, 1999 at 12:03:20, al blanco wrote: >> >>>Robert: >>> >>>I'm starting to feel the same way about cm6000, maybe we should all start >>>to give it a little bit more respect however I don't understand how it can >>>play a game with Fritz 5.32 and beat it with only 16MB of RAM. Any comments? >>>That's only 1/4 of Fritz' memory resources ! >> >>Yeah but that is worth only about 14 elo points. >> >>Matt Frank > >That's hard to quantify. In the endgame the hash tables can improve the speed >of a program by a factor of 3 maybe more. This could mean an extra ply or two >of depth. You never know what lurks just over the next ply!(Maybe a winning >move) >Jim Walker Yeah, your right the hash tables really come into play in the end games. When I run Hiarcs 7 with full access 64 MG hash tables, the speed is a lot slower in the middle game compared to the end game. Towards the end game, you can really see the added benefit as the next iteration is at ply 8 NOW!!!! Matt Frank Matt Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.